http://animalrights.about.com/od/animallaw/f/AnimalsProperty.htm
1. Animal should not be considered property under the law because unlike inanimate objects, they are sentient beings with their own lives and interests. Thus, the law should change the property status of animals to reflect the social values.
2. The author claims that animal should not be considered as property.
3. "In most cases, you have a legal right to destroy your own property. If someone decides to chop up their kitchen table and use it for firewood, that is their legal right. But if someone abuses or neglects an animal, they should be criminally prosecuted" - this assertion shows the difference between pets and property.
"Most Americans consider their animals to be part of the family" - this assertion gives the common social value to convince people.
1. Animal should not be considered property under the law because unlike inanimate objects, they are sentient beings with their own lives and interests. Thus, the law should change the property status of animals to reflect the social values.
2. The author claims that animal should not be considered as property.
3. "In most cases, you have a legal right to destroy your own property. If someone decides to chop up their kitchen table and use it for firewood, that is their legal right. But if someone abuses or neglects an animal, they should be criminally prosecuted" - this assertion shows the difference between pets and property.
"Most Americans consider their animals to be part of the family" - this assertion gives the common social value to convince people.
Title should include: "source #" and title of source.
ReplyDelete